The U.S. company Energy Efficient has designed houses in Buenos Aires' gated communities. |
Floods, Page 2
And because these housing developments are in flood-prone areas, embankments six to 10 meters high are built around them to keep water out.
And because these housing developments are in flood-prone areas, embankments six to 10 meters high are built around them to keep water out.
“They protect these developments but they work
as dikes that contribute to flooding in surrounding neighborhoods…What protects
them hurts those who are outside,” Pintos said.
Ten percent of the 350,000 inhabitants of
Tigre live in gated communities, which cover half of the municipality’s land
area, said Martín Gianella, the municipal general secretary.
“This is what we call a model of
socio-territorial segregation,” he said. “Walls are dividing the territory and
society.”
Gianella said that Tigre, on the north side of
Greater Buenos Aires, has historically suffered from flooding during the
sudestadas.
“But in the last five years we have seen a new
phenomenon: flooding from rainfall, and it’s no coincidence that it happens
mainly in neighborhoods located next to gated communities built over the last
decade,” he added.
The official urged the municipal government to
oversee and regulate the construction of private neighborhoods “and to levy a
special tax on these mega-developments, to invest in the necessary hydrological
works.”
Robledo, the urban planner, stressed that
changes in the hydrologic regimes don’t only affect the areas near the gated
communities, because Buenos Aires was built on a plain crisscrossed by rivers.
“The city is part of an urban metabolism –
what happens in one place affects the rest,” she explained. That is why
solutions must be “interjurisdictional,” she added.
According to Robledo, the construction of
these gated communities “favors the privatization of the city and real estate
speculation, to the detriment of the rest of the population.”
Driven by the profit motive, “the companies
buy up historically cheap land prone to flooding, fill it in to make it
inhabitable, and earn extraordinary profits,” she said.
Pintos said “this is the result of the growth
of a model of urban development followed by municipalities that are prone to
favoring big investment flows.”
Pintos and Robledo agreed that while
regulations and maps of socio-environmental risks posed by this kind of housing
development exist, they are not enforced.
Big real estate entrepreneurs in the province of Buenos Aires,
like Gonzalo Monarca, the president of the Grupo
Monarca, deny that they are responsible for the problems, which they
blame on climate change.
“That’s a fallacious argument,” Robledo said.
“Climate change is happening at a global level, but the consequences are
stronger or weaker depending on the way cities have been built and inhabited.”
“If we build in a drainage basin that receives
overflow when the water level in the river goes up, it’s obvious that the water
is going to run off into other areas,” she said.
Robledo stated that if this kind of housing
development is not banned or regulated, cities will be flooded more frequently
and for longer periods of time, even when the rainfall is not particularly
heavy.
Pintos went even further, calling for
solutions that are “not very popular” in political terms, and which may be
complex and burdensome, but which she said should not be ruled out if the
problem continues to grow.
As an example, she cited the relocation of
families from the banks of the Mississippi river in New Orleans, after
Hurricane Katrina in 2005.
Other intermediate solutions, she said, would
be to prohibit the construction of new private neighborhoods in fragile
ecosystems, and a review of the permits already granted.
She also said companies should assume the
costs of remediation of environmental problems, although such works would be a
“bandaid in the face of a critical situation that could have been avoided if
rationality had prevailed.”
Leandro Silva, the head of environment at the
Defensoría del Pueblo de la Nación – Argentina’s ombudsperson’s office –
pointed out that in 2010 his office
warned the municipalities of Zárate, Campana, Escobar, Tigre and San Fernando
about the risks posed by the expansion of gated communities in the ecosystem of
the Paraná river delta, and urged them to respect environmental impact studies
and to impose strict controls.
“The recurrent flooding and the impact on the
most vulnerable segments of society make it necessary to reinforce these
mechanisms and proactively exercise prevention, implementing in the watersheds
all of the environmental management instruments required by our legislation:
environmental impact assessments, citizen participation, environmental zoning
and access to public information,” he said.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario