Aecio Neves and Brazil's President Dilma Rousseff. |
Brazil, page 2.
The two rivals are now both hoping to win the
support of Silva and the coalition that backed her, headed by the socialists,
which could be decisive in the runoff.
The difference between the moderate left-wing
Rousseff and the business-friendly centrist Neves in the first round was 8.37
million votes, while Silva took 22.17 million votes.
What is still unclear is the direction that
will be taken by the heterogeneous coalition headed by the PSB. In 2010, when
the environmentalist ran for president as the Green Party (PV) candidate, she
won 19.3 percent of the vote and remained neutral during the campaign for the
runoff between candidates of the same two parties as today.
But the situation was very different back
then. Silva presented herself as a third alternative, criticizing the polarization
between the PT and the PSDB, and setting forth her own proposals.
Dissatisfied with the PV, she abandoned the
Greens to create the Sustainability Network, aimed at promoting
socioenvironmental sustainability and a new way of doing politics.
But her group did not achieve the necessary
492,000 signatures to become a political party because the electoral court
failed to validate 95,000 signatures. Silva then decided to join the PSB, which
named her vice presidential candidate on the ticket led by socialist leader
Eduardo Campos.
However, Campos died in a plane crash on Aug. 13 and Silva
replaced him as presidential candidate. Seen as the leader who best represented
the widespread discontent that fueled the June 2013 nationwide protests,
her popularity soared, until she was ahead of Rousseff in the opinion polls.
But the future of Silva, who took only two
percentage points more of the vote than in the 2010 elections, is now cloudy.
Her political and personal weaknesses were revealed by the harassment from her
opponents, especially the Rousseff campaign, which mounted aggressive ad
attacks against the other woman in the race.
For example, the PT charged that Silva would
eliminate the Bolsa Familia program, which provides cash transfers to nearly 14
million poor households, would reduce investments in pre-salt oil fields
exploration, and would hand power over to the bankers.
Under Brazil’s election laws, Silva’s team had
just two minutes of electoral programming on nightly television – hardy enough
time to defend herself from the allegations, let alone set forth her
environmental proposals, which brought her international renown, or other
attractive points on her platform, such as a “renewal of democracy”.
Because free electoral programming time in
Brazil is proportionate to the parliamentary representation of each coalition,
Rousseff had 11 minutes a day of broadcasting time.
For the second round, the time allotted is the
same for both candidates: 10 minutes each.
But the ambiguous policy proposals and
reversals that marked Silva’s campaign also hurt her image. She started out by
reversing her stance just after the socialist party officially announced its
support for same-sex marriage and other rights for homosexuals. She later fell
into other contradictions regarding her record in the Senate.
Nor did Silva perform well in the televised
debates.
It is not yet known whether she will stay with
the PSB, which was left without a strong leader to hold it together, or will go
it alone with her Sustainability Network. The socialists seem to be coming
apart: some of the PSB’s leaders have already come out in favor of Neves, while
others have ties to the governing PT.
On the economic front, Silva’s advisers are
close to their counterparts in the PSDB, which would push her towards
supporting that party’s candidate in the second round. To that is added the
accusations by the PT, which include the label “neoliberal” because of Silva’s
economic orientation.
Backing either of the two candidates still in
the race would hurt her central stance, which is to lead a third route to
overcome the polarization between the PT and the PSDB while renovating and
cleaning up Brazilian politics.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario